Home » Articles » Opinion » Trading good players during a competitive window will not make the White Sox a better team

Trading good players during a competitive window will not make the White Sox a better team

by Nik Gaur

White Sox fans were understandably angry toward the end of the 2022 regular season. The team was wildly disappointing, but nothing had changed, and (at the time) nobody was being held accountable. Despite some positive reaction to the hiring of Pedro Grifol as manager, fans are again upset by a report from The Athletic that suggests the team will cut payroll in advance of the 2023 season.

If the White Sox do not have ample budget room for free agency, then it is very unlikely that they will be able to address their holes (such as at second base, left field, right field, and the starting rotation) without making trades. The problem, of course, is that the White Sox farm system is still well below-average, even after a relatively encouraging year. Thus, trading for positions of need may need to come at the cost of MLB talent.

Opposing teams are likely wary of trading for White Sox players following a dismal 2022 season, and the White Sox are less likely to trade a pre-arbitration player since their goal is also to meet a reduced budget. Therefore, Liam Hendriks and Lucas Giolito often get mentioned as trade candidates.

Hendriks is one of the best relief pitchers in baseball, and with two years and $29 million remaining on his contract, his salary suddenly looks quite affordable when compared with other elite closers like Edwin Diaz. As the White Sox bullpen has been oversaturated, trading from it to address a need could make some sense.

However, a trade of Hendriks would plainly be an attempt to cut payroll, and unless a team offers a truly ridiculous return that addresses multiple White Sox needs with proven talent, the roster is more likely to get worse rather than better as a result. While Reynaldo Lopez or Kendall Graveman could serve as the team’s closer, trading one of the best relievers in baseball is something a team does when it is rebuilding, not contending.

While Lucas Giolito had a down year in 2022, there is a reason that (smart) teams would be interested in him. He is a bounce-back candidate for 2023 given his pedigree, age, work ethic, and that he will enter free agency after the season. He is estimated to make about $10.8 million in arbitration, which would offer plenty of surplus value even if he only marginally improves from his 1.8 fWAR in 2022.

Of course, this is without even mentioning that trading Giolito would open up yet another hole in a starting rotation that still needs to replace free agent Johnny Cueto. Much like with Hendriks, a team would need to make a remarkable offer with multiple proven MLB players for the trade to be worth it for the White Sox.


White Sox fans have largely accepted at this point that the team will not be a suitor for Aaron Judge-level talent in free agency. If the White Sox could just match last year’s payroll or exceed it by $5-10 million, there would be no need to discuss trading an elite closer in Hendriks or a likely bounce-back starter in Giolito to save money.

Not only would trading either player likely make the team worse in 2023, but trading good players on reasonable contracts during a competitive window because you don’t want to pay them implies that you might as well enter another rebuild. Of course, everything at this point is just a rumor (largely based on the previously mentioned report from The Athletic), but the organization has not earned the benefit of the doubt, especially after last offseason.

No player on the White Sox should be untouchable, and teams should always be open-minded. That said, trading Hendriks or Giolito should not be received positively by White Sox fans unless the return resembles a Shelby Miller trade level of fleece. The holes the team may fill with such trades would be unlikely to compensate for the holes that are created as a result. The organization would frame the moves as “best for the team in 2023,” but fans should see the trades as what they truly are: salary dumps.


Be sure to follow us on social media @SoxOn35th for more updates!

Featured Photo: © Robert Edwards-USA TODAY Sports

Join the Conversation

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mjc

Unfortunately 2023 is going to be a wash. So your payroll dump scenario Nik, is probably spot on. This team has too many holes to fill. And, Hahn is already crying poor/budget issues. (In other words, Jerry won’t allow spending). I unfortunately see another season of .500 baseball (if lucky). Some of the players will bounce back next year. But in order for them to make a serious run… most will have to have career seasons. I just don’t see that. Since Reisndorf has been the Pretend Chairman, when the Sox have had a down season or don’t meet their… Read more »

John

I can agree that Gio should be kept, at least until the trade deadline, because the team would be selling low on him. I disagree on Hendriks, though. As the article says, Diaz’s new contract makes Hendriks seem much more affordable and he’s been consistently very good for years now. With ReyLo ready to take over the closer role and Crochet coming back, the Sox’ BP should be strong enough to weather that loss, especially if it means filling their glaring hole at 2B or LF (I believe Colas will be the Opening Day RF, so at least one spot… Read more »

Pete

Hi Nik: Trading Giolito is a no for me. Selling low, creates need for 160+ IP and “only” frees up $11M which we would need to spend (likely more) for his replacement. Trading Hendriks (love the guy) makes more fiscal sense, and his trade value is higher especially for a large payroll team in need of an elite closer like the Dodgers. A trade of Hendriks for Lux (lefty hitting 2B with 4 years of control) plus some prospect capital could make the team considerably better in 2023 by gaining a productive everyday player, plus lots of potential upside for… Read more »

woody partain

A major market team acting like they are Oakland or Pittsburgh wanting to reduce payroll for 2023. As long as Reindorf owns the team nothing good will happen. Reindorf sell the team White Sox fans deserve better!

SQF

If they are NOT cutting payroll, trading Hendriks might be a good call. With huge holes at LF, 2B, and SP, the $14 million for this year would be better spent on a decent free agent for one of those holes. I’m also wondering why we’re hearing about Sox interest in a catcher (Sean Murphy), but not interest in left-handed starters for 2B or LF. They might even be able to get a decent starting lefty to platoon at 2B without giving up important major league pieces (like Cavan Biggio or Tony Kemp). I’d very much like to hear more… Read more »

You may also like

5
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
%d bloggers like this: